Family courts across the country are grappling with the emergence of AI-monitored parenting plans, in which technology is used to track compliance with custody agreements. At least 15 states are now considering legislation to regulate the practice.
Apps like CustodyGuard and ParentTrack use GPS, communication logs, and schedule tracking to document whether parents comply with court-ordered custody arrangements. Some family courts have begun ordering the use of such tools in high-conflict custody cases.
Proponents argue that AI monitoring provides objective data to protect children and ensure both parents fulfill their obligations. In cases involving domestic violence or substance abuse, the technology can provide early warning of concerning patterns.
Critics raise serious privacy concerns, arguing that constant surveillance of parents' movements and communications infringes on constitutional rights. The American Civil Liberties Union has filed challenges in three states, calling the practice "digital handcuffs on families."
The American Bar Association's Family Law Section has issued guidelines recommending that AI monitoring be used only in cases with documented safety concerns and that data collection be limited to custody-relevant information only.
